The companies know it, and the lobbyThe phenomenal Last Database thing they have done to protect themselves, not only through intellectual property rules but also through the future digital economy agenda, shows that they are not willing to give up Last Database space and that their profit may well be based on the violation of people's rights14
Exemption from customs taxes for the sale of digital services. As the world becomes more and more digitized, the services Last Database contracted and consumed by a country may come (in fact they already do) from anywhere in the world. In technical terms, it is an import of services.
The commercial rules that are under negotiation want to Last Database impose a zero tariff for these imports, which worsens the conditions for local developers who must compete with large transnationals. This is already in force in the WTO through a Last Database moratorium that is renewed year after year and exempts service providers from paying taxes. In the ongoing negotiations, it is sought to fix this Last Database exemption once and for all.
Obligation of the principle of web neutrality. This clause seeks that the States cannot regulate the contents or the companies that operate in their digital markets. While limiting content can lead to abuse by authorities, it is also true that countries like China have developed by controlling.
And limiting the players that operate in their Last Database digital economy.
The truth is that intellectual property regulations prohibit knowing the criteria and ways in which the artificial intelligence that we Last Database use on a daily basis is programmed. But that is not the only valuable knowledge in this technology. Data processing draws conclusions about our behaviors in order to anticipate them. That anticipation is what Shoshana Zuboff called "behavioral surplus": By anticipating behaviors, tech companies can also eventually influence . This was seen in cases Last Database such as Cambridge Analytica.